
I was just sitting here, writing away and procrastinating on homework (whose bright idea was going back to school anyway?) when I get the wonderful little ding that signifies a new email finding its way to me. Seriously, that sound is like crack. I love getting email.
Anyway, said email was my daily subscription from The Story Siren, which of course only served to make my happiness even brighter. The post that spurred me hopping over here to share my thoughts was
I Love It, I Hate It, Get Over It. You know in my mind, The Story Siren has become so prolific that sometimes we forget that just like our favorite authors, she is a real person with her own opinions and thoughts. That's why I just love it when she breaks from her normal routine and lays everything out for us. She's not afraid to share her opinions - positive, negative, whatever.
This post discusses something that has been troubling me for a while now. Recently, she has been getting more and more questions about why her reviews are always so positive. I suffer from this same problem (although luckily nobody really points it out to me). I do realize that a majority of
my reviews are positive reviews. I hope that doesn't make readers less likely to come back or make my reviews any less meaningful.
I can't change the way I review. Well okay, I suppose I could change, but why would I? I write my thoughts as they come to me with no censorship. If I like a book, I like a book. I'm not going to pour through a story, looking for negative aspects simply because I've filled my quota of "positive" reviews for the month. Yes, I have a rating scale of A-F. Why? Because I don't want to deal with adding the extra graphics of stars to what I already consider an overly busy blog. A-F = 5-1 stars. Also, I probably use this rating system because I'm still recovering from the trauma of high school.
Have I ever given a book an F? No. In fact, I don't think I've ever given but one, maybe two books a C. Those books received that "grade" simply because they were books that I didn't want to finish and yet felt obliged to do so. I still wouldn't call those negative reviews, however. I know I've mentioned it before - I am a firm believer that there is something positive in every book if you just take the time to look. Therefore, it would make sense that the majority of my reviews are positive reviews.
Another fact that The Story Siren pointed out, and one that I completely agree with, is that typically we are drawn to books that we think we might like. I would say that right now, 90% of the books that I review are books that I buy or borrow (usually buy since I can't stand to let books go once I have them ... my precious...). It's no secret that the economy stinks right now. I'm probably not going to spend my money on a book that doesn't interest me and with so many books that I want to read, the chances of me borrowing a book that doesn't interest me is slim. If there is something about a book that makes me pick it up, I would have to say that normally I am going to find something in there I like.
So, analyzing why I pick up the books that I do and how I view books when I read them, it should be no wonder that many of my reviews are positive. I know that readers want some sort of quick rating system so that they can see it and move on if they don't want to read the full review. In my case, I suppose you'd really just have to focus on the breakdown of the score and the paragraph following it. Those will typically tell you my favorite aspects of the book and what audiences I would recommend it to. Of course I hope people actually read my reviews and see my thoughts. I think those are a better judge of my opinion of the book than a simple letter grade.
Like some others, if there is a book that I can't stand so much that I can't finish it, I obviously won't review it. I don't think it's necessarily fair to review a book unless you've read the entire thing. Maybe the redeeming quality of the book is within the last chapter. Perhaps it's a personal thing and someone else would completely fall in love with this book. Whatever it is, I don't feel right reviewing a book that I can't finish and typically these would be the only ones that I give a "negative" review to.
What are you thoughts on positive and negative reviews? Do you find negative reviews helpful or adversely, have you found positive reviews unhelpful?
Thanks to The Story Siren for opening up this conversation.